Papers that use empirical, large-scale, or naturalistic data to challenge alarmist public and scholarly assumptions about the prevalence, exposure patterns, and societal harms of online misinformation, showing that exposure is concentrated among few users, effects are limited, and everyday misinformation is broader and less exotic than commonly assumed.
Papers
- Adam2026-tz
- Allcott2025-jb
- Appel2026-qr
- Bakshy2015-rn
- Bergeron-Boutin2026-yh
- Brady2026-ln
- Brown2026-br
- Budak2024-ef
- Di-Marco2025-aa
- Frischlich2025-vn
- Giglietto2022-b30e8b4e
- Goel2025-iq
- Gonzalez-Bailon2024-rq
- Green2025-ap
- Hameleers2026-mc
- Hartmann2025-px
- Hourigan2026-oc
- Karlsson2026-hd
- Luhring2025-od
- Lyons2026-ca
- Marwick2025-vx
- Mosleh2024-op
- Nenno2025-xa
- Oswald2025-km
- Pante2025-pq
- Prochaska2025-ef
- Renault2025-uh
- Rossi2023-847d5a9f
- Rossini2026-jn
- Spampatti2026-kx
- Van_Erkel2026-mk
- Ventura2025-sw
- Voelkel2026-lc
- noauthor_undated-bm